In another move to eliminate all potential sources of perceived harm to children, U.S. schools are beginning to ban tag. The game. The one that, apparently, has damaged millions of children in previous generations. But now, thankfully, we know better: physical activity that involves actual minor physical contact is deeply harmful to children.
Wait, no, strike that. Actually, schools are banning tag not out of fear of injuries, but out of fear of lawsuits spawned by injuries. It seems bumps and bruises scare school adminstrators largely because they may be accompanied by an angry parent’s lawyer.
To alleviate this fear of parents, administrators are requiring kids to develop a non-contact version of game. That’s right: non-contact tag. “What we require is that children do not touch each other,” said one principal.
In the wake of non-contact tag, other games are being altered for safety:
- Baseball will no longer include bats or baserunners
- Four-square players must first obtain permission from the other players before releasing the ball
- Hide-and-seek will require hiding players to remain in plain sight
- Basketball will feature baskets no more than 2.5 feet above the floor, and players’ movement and shooting may in no way be impeded by other players (per NBA rules)
- Flag football will be replaced by Madden 2007
The standard by which all other children’s games – no, all sports, maybe even all experiences – must be judged is
smear the queer. My children will play this game in their childhood; if need be, just the two of them, should no one
else join. The phrase “you haven’t lived until you’ve. . .” has but one legitimate use, and that is to explain
the importance of smear the queer.
This is probably more an example of paranoid management than a faulty legal system. Unless the field on
which they play is full of landmines, or unless the children have developed some Rambo-style tag, I don’t see
this as a major area of liability. But then again, I’m not the one who would be held liable.
I do enjoy that the article defined “tag.” I was expecting it to continue on by defining “school” and “children.”
I have fond memories of you guys playing StQ at Chelsea football games. The fondest is the time I got involved and we broke my walker. Remember that? We broke the crossbar on that old metal walker. I think we may still have it, too. Somewhere.
I didn’t mean to blame the legal system; I hope that’s not what came across in the post. It is the paranoid management that bothers me.
The serious definition of tag did amuse me. It was like they were explaining some deep idea or formula, except they were explaining a child’s game.